S&R Blog


Who will lead pharma back to a constructive, trusting, and value-based industry?

The “conspirators” have been revealed—the  Pharmageddon2012 “conspirators” that is.  This past week, the November issue of MedAd News broke a story on Pharmageddon2012 and the people behind the scene—S+R Medical Communications (SRMC) and Friday Morning.

For those of you who have not taken the time to check out Pharmageddon2012, this multifaceted website uses a variety of social media outlets to carefully and anonymously describe what we believe is the pharma industry’s greatest problem—the breakdown of communication and trust between physicians and the industry.

The site, describes the issues and problems that exist but what it doesn’t address is the passion, belief, and attitude of those people at SRMC and Friday Morning who have to live and deal with the implications of what Pharmageddon2012 represents. You must admit a campaign like Pharmageddon2012 could be risky for a business that that has spent over 18 years enabling and helping our pharma clients devise the very same communication pieces and strategies that we believe contributed to the demise of physician trust.

However, we also believe that someone needs to lead the charge for change and why shouldn’t it be SRMC and Friday Morning? We spent the last 10 years closely watching, listening, and seeing firsthand the strategies and tactics that led to the mistrust problems. We were frustrated and angry about the situation, and we struggled to understand what new strategies and solutions we might incorporate into our business model. The end objective is to help us build our success—and, equally as important, that of our clients.
To that end, we must help clients find ways to restore physician confidence AND improve patient outcomes.

So while we are willing put our collective necks on the line, the real question is which pharma companies will be the first to understand and see the need for communicating with physicians in a different way? Which companies will choose to use educational programming that is needs-based? Are you, as a pharma marketer, willing to use total transparency and clarity as you describe ALL of the important aspects of how your brand is best used? When a physician asks, “Which of my patients are specifically and best suited for what your product does?” what will your sales force say? How will you provide educational and promotional programs that allow your sales force to bring value and relationship building to every sales call?

Is YOUR pharma company willing be a leader and change the pharma/physician communication model back to a constructive, trusting, value-based relationship? Do you believe that you can participate in this change process and at the same time positively impact your brand’s financial achievements? It’s tough to be a leader and to stand out from the crowd. But in fact, that is the opportunity that is before us right now.

If you have the same passion and spirit for this issue as we do, if your brain and heart tell you it is time to do it differently, please contact me. I can show you how we can work together to put our industry, your company, and your products back on a more productive, positive path.

Sincerely,
Dave Recht
CEO, North State Resources, Inc.
davidr@northstateresouces.com



The pharmaceutical industry is about to experience the biggest shift in product marketing history. Are you prepared?

Be prepared.

Visit the site.

View the videos.

Know the issues.

Read the write-up in Med Ad News.



FDA social media (#FDASM) week kicks into high gear today
November 12, 2009, 3:18 pm
Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: , , , , ,

Starting today, the FDA will be holding a 2-day hearing on how pharmaceutical companies use the web and social-media tools to market their products. Sixty-two speakers from pharmaceutical companies, media companies, agencies, and others have been asked to give their viewpoints.

Is it a little too late? Maybe. Is it a step in the right direction? Probably. Will the FDA, pharma and marketers have a better understanding on what needs to be done to regulate the internet and social media? Likely. Whatever the outcome, it’s about time.

Follow all of the action (via real-time tweets) at www.fdasm.com.

Or listen to the streaming webcast courtesy of the FDA at http://www.capitolconnection.net/capcon/fda/111209/FDAlive.htm.

 



It’s raining pumpkins in Durham
November 11, 2009, 2:56 pm
Filed under: advertising | Tags: , , , ,

After nearly 2 weeks of feasting on Halloween candy, we still have few post-halloween treats to share with everyone.



300 reasons CME is evolving

My, how far CME has come in the age of technology! It seems like just yesterday that CME was in the infancy stage of being offered through websites and portals. But now with the advent of ReachMD and its unique XM Radio/iPhone/social media approach to CME, physicians truly have a wide range of mediums to increase their knowledge. And it doesn’t stop there. According to the Bernard Sklar’s CME List their are more than 300 CME sites/portals/apps/podcasting available through the internet today compared to 87 just 10 years ago. And when you look at the physician participants from that time frame the numbers have increased by more than 4 million (181,922 to 4,365,013).

So where are all of these physicians spending most of their time? The top 30 CME sites (according to #hours available) are below.

The Top 30 CME Sites (according to the number of hours offered)

1.    Contemporary Forums-Online CE Library
2.   Audio Digest
3.   Challenger Online Lecture Hall
4.   CMEWeb
5.   Medscape CME Center
6.   Virtual Lecture Hall
7.   Clinical Directors Network (CDN)
8.   Pri-Med Online
9.   NetCE Continuing Education on the Internet
10.  American Society for Clinical Pathology
11.   RSNA (Radiological Soc North America)
12.   TheAnswerPage
13.   Practical Reviews Online
14.   CardioVillage
15.   Sullivan Group (The)
16.   theheart.org
17.   CME Institute
18.   CMELectures.org
19.   Oncologist (The)
20.  Harvard Online CME
21.   Drexel MCP Hahnemann Virt Grand Rounds
22.   MedRisk Online
23.   Johns Hopkins Advanced Studies Courses
24.   American Acad Ped PREP Self-Ass Online
25.   Neurology (J American Acad Neurology)
26.   Washington University (St Louis)
27.   Children’s of Minnesota Grand Rounds
28.   FreeCME
29.   NEJM Weekly CME Program
30.   American Acad of Orthopaedic Surgery OKO



78 percent of US interested in mobile healthcare solutions
October 19, 2009, 3:57 pm
Filed under: mobile | Tags: , , , , , ,

Attention healthcare industry! Mobile healthcare solutions will be a reality sooner than you think. And we aren’t talking about just blood pressure monitoring apps, but full-blown health services.

According to a new study conducted by wireless industry association CTIA with Harris Interactive, a vast majority of the US (78%) is interested in mobile health solutions and 15 percent of the U.S. is extremely or very interested in learning more about mHealth.

The study used a combination of two online studies of U.S. adults (5,563) and physicians (115 general practitioners and 129 specialists) to gauge their interest in mHealth service options.  Survey respondents felt that access to mHealth would allow for more home-based care (68%), make medical care easier to obtain (51%), and give patients more freedom and choice (51%). More highlights are below.

mHealth Today

mHealth Appeal

mHealth Appeal

Read the full report here.



25 things every pharma product manager should know before creating a marketing plan for 2010 and beyond
October 9, 2009, 2:52 pm
Filed under: advertising, behavior | Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Plus a few more. If you are a non-believer in the effect of social media on the media landscape check out socialnomics. If you are a believer, then what you may not know is how other mediums are changing for the better or worse. Introducing, Did you know 4.0.



If your ad suffers from one of these traits, you may need to rethink it
October 1, 2009, 1:55 pm
Filed under: advertising | Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Every brand manager, marketing director, CMO, account person and creative wants to know -  what makes the perfect ad? Is it the headline or the visual? What about that brilliant logo? Maybe it’s the call-to-action or the tagline that keeps them coming back for more? Or that one design element that caused you to stop in your tracks and stand at attention?

Whatever it may be, the folks at Business Week (Steve McKee) have created a simple list to tell you what it shouldn’t be:

1. Boring. Yep, boring. Why do we watch TV, listen to the radio, read the newspaper, or go online? Three reasons: information, entertainment, and engagement. Ads that fail to offer at least two of these three benefits flop.

2. Boorish. You shouldn’t think of your advertising as being about your brand, you should think of it as an extension of your brand (see “A Practical Guide to Branding”). If it’s loud, annoying, insulting, offensive, or self-centered, people will think the same of your products or services (see “The Cocktail Party Test for Advertising”).

3. Safe. If you worry too much about offending someone, you’re likely to not attract anyone.

4. Trying to do too much. The best an ad can do is communicate one single, compelling idea, and in the age of the Internet—when people know they can go online to get all the additional information they need—it’s crazy to ask an ad to do more than that.

5. Fixing a non-advertising problem. A common mistake many companies make is trying to use advertising to fix another problem. It may be faulty or outdated product design, an uncompetitive cost structure, customer service letdowns, or any number of other things. It’s not as if they do so intentionally; it’s just that it’s a whole lot easier to put on a new coat of paint than it is to fix the foundation that’s causing the drywall to crack.

Read Steve’s full list here.



Medical data and the infectious power of social networks
September 23, 2009, 6:05 pm
Filed under: behavior | Tags: , , ,

Recent studies have shown that friends behave similarly. In fact, if our friends buy something, there’s a better-than-average chance we’ll buy it, too.  Obviously, this is a great insight for marketers, but may even be more important for the pharmaceutical industry and healthcare in general.

In a recent Wired Magazine Article, Johnathan Leher explains  how a group of patients from a Farmingham, MA study might demonstrate how relationships directly influence behavior and thus health and happiness.

The Framingham Heart Study, started in 1948, comprised of 5,124 male and female subjects and has revealed many of the risk factors associated with cardiovascular disease, including smoking and hypertension. Data from the study combined with recorded family and friend information of the patients led Nicholas Christakis, a social scientist and internist at Harvard, and James Fowler, a political scientist at UC San Diego, to develop a social network that spanned 60 years. Some of the findings are below:

Obesity

1985 - Obesity2000 - Obesity

Smoking

1971 - Smokers

2001 - Smokers



Has pharmaceutical advertising regressed?
September 17, 2009, 3:27 pm
Filed under: advertising | Tags: , , , , , ,

Simple and effective. More classics can be found at AdViews.